<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Competing with the iPhone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wrede.interfacedesign.org/archives/1526.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wrede.interfacedesign.org/archives/1526.html</link>
	<description>Notes from Prof. Oliver Wrede on Interface, Interaction and Information Design &#38; more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2011 15:48:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Nottebrock</title>
		<link>http://wrede.interfacedesign.org/archives/1526.html/comment-page-1#comment-4325</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Nottebrock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 13:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wrede.interfacedesign.org/archives/1526.html#comment-4325</guid>
		<description>Frisch eingetrudelt via heise: &#039;Palm Pre setzt auf Apple iTunes&#039; (http://bit.ly/5lTJx)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frisch eingetrudelt via heise: &#8216;Palm Pre setzt auf Apple iTunes&#8217; (<a href="http://bit.ly/5lTJx" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/5lTJx</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver Wrede</title>
		<link>http://wrede.interfacedesign.org/archives/1526.html/comment-page-1#comment-856</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Wrede</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 19:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wrede.interfacedesign.org/archives/1526.html#comment-856</guid>
		<description>I observed people have a hard time to use the non-haptic keyboard – the missing tactile feedback is somewhat irritating for people. It &quot;feels&quot; less of a problem if the tick-sound is enabled. The mere coincidence of a sound supports the idetification of a sucessful keypress much more than the visual &quot;highlight&quot; of the key above the finger cap does.

On the other hand I think omitting the keyboard makes the production of the device much simpler. I personally do not like devices that are not one solid piece (e.g. slide-out keyboards etc.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I observed people have a hard time to use the non-haptic keyboard – the missing tactile feedback is somewhat irritating for people. It &#8220;feels&#8221; less of a problem if the tick-sound is enabled. The mere coincidence of a sound supports the idetification of a sucessful keypress much more than the visual &#8220;highlight&#8221; of the key above the finger cap does.</p>
<p>On the other hand I think omitting the keyboard makes the production of the device much simpler. I personally do not like devices that are not one solid piece (e.g. slide-out keyboards etc.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Nottebrock</title>
		<link>http://wrede.interfacedesign.org/archives/1526.html/comment-page-1#comment-744</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Nottebrock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 09:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wrede.interfacedesign.org/archives/1526.html#comment-744</guid>
		<description>&quot;A Built-In QWERTY-Keyboard&quot; - What an amazing iPhone-killing feature. Not! The iPhone has it&#039;s keyboard built in the software, which makes it much easier to handle and - by the way - allows you to change the layout. Plus: No need to fear any fair wear and tear effects. What about built-in Mailclients and Webbrowsers? Seen on iPhone as well and even though one might still miss a flash-plugin releasse, both the safari and built-in Mailclient do a pretty good job. And what about that &#039;killing&#039; multi-touch display? Has anyone pronouncing this pre-phone being &#039;the next iPhone killer&#039; ever even had an iPhone at his disposal?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A Built-In QWERTY-Keyboard&#8221; &#8211; What an amazing iPhone-killing feature. Not! The iPhone has it&#8217;s keyboard built in the software, which makes it much easier to handle and &#8211; by the way &#8211; allows you to change the layout. Plus: No need to fear any fair wear and tear effects. What about built-in Mailclients and Webbrowsers? Seen on iPhone as well and even though one might still miss a flash-plugin releasse, both the safari and built-in Mailclient do a pretty good job. And what about that &#8216;killing&#8217; multi-touch display? Has anyone pronouncing this pre-phone being &#8216;the next iPhone killer&#8217; ever even had an iPhone at his disposal?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver Wrede</title>
		<link>http://wrede.interfacedesign.org/archives/1526.html/comment-page-1#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Wrede</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 19:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wrede.interfacedesign.org/archives/1526.html#comment-58</guid>
		<description>Yes, Tamim, you may be right. But I think in the best case the Palm Pre would repeat the rise &amp; fall of the Zune MP3 Player – which was introduced by Microsoft with much more marketing power than Palm has.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Tamim, you may be right. But I think in the best case the Palm Pre would repeat the rise &amp; fall of the Zune MP3 Player – which was introduced by Microsoft with much more marketing power than Palm has.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tamim</title>
		<link>http://wrede.interfacedesign.org/archives/1526.html/comment-page-1#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>Tamim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 19:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wrede.interfacedesign.org/archives/1526.html#comment-57</guid>
		<description>I guess you are right that the Pre is not going to be the iPhone Killer and i think there will &quot;never&quot; be an iPhone Killer. The company that wants to kill the iPhone has to kill Apple, which is a bit difficult. But i think that the Pre will succeed because it is a good device with a good UI. The most important Apps will be available on the Pre which could be enough for a lot of people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess you are right that the Pre is not going to be the iPhone Killer and i think there will &#8220;never&#8221; be an iPhone Killer. The company that wants to kill the iPhone has to kill Apple, which is a bit difficult. But i think that the Pre will succeed because it is a good device with a good UI. The most important Apps will be available on the Pre which could be enough for a lot of people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

