<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>details of a global brain &#187; Cognition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wrede.interfacedesign.org/categories/cognition/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wrede.interfacedesign.org</link>
	<description>Notes from Prof. Oliver Wrede on Interface, Interaction and Information Design &#38; more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 14:48:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Tinderbox goes Universal</title>
		<link>http://wrede.interfacedesign.org/archives/1724.html</link>
		<comments>http://wrede.interfacedesign.org/archives/1724.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 11:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Wrede</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cognition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wrede.interfacedesign.org/?p=1724</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the tools I am using for years now is Tinderbox from Eastgate. I have used it for quite some time to write this weblog here (but swichted to WordPress + MarsEdit recently). Nevertheless I think Tinderbox is a helper in many ways &#8211; although there are always features that can be and will [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the tools I am using for years now is <a href="http://www.eastgate.com/Tinderbox/">Tinderbox from Eastgate</a>. I have used it for quite some time to write this weblog here (but swichted to WordPress + MarsEdit recently). Nevertheless I think Tinderbox is a helper in many ways &#8211; although there are always features that can be and will be missed.</p>
<p>With a retail price of $229 USD the tool is not cheap &#8211; but depending on the usage and potential productivity gain this can be a bargain.</p>
<p><img src="http://wrede.interfacedesign.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/tinderbox.jpg" border="0" alt="tinderbox.jpg" width="480" height="317" /></p>
<p>If you are ready and able to write some <a href="http://www.eastgate.com/Tinderbox/cookbook/Export1.html">export templates</a> one can export almost anything to XML or HTML and turn that into layouted documents, presentations or websites.</p>
<p>The &#8220;magic&#8221; of Tinderbox is that it allows visual unstructured brainstorming and turn that into structured documents over time. But does not stop there like other mind mapping tools: by adding text notes, metadata, agents and actions that perform queries and manipulate data. So you can make your document smarter and add some automatism to it. There are endless ways to use Tinderbox and to make it fit to your brain.</p>
<p>After watching some <a href="http://www.eastgate.com/Tinderbox/Screencasts.html">screencasts</a> you can read some examples of <a href="http://www.eastgate.com/Tinderbox/Visualize.html">what people are doing</a> with Tinderbox.</p>
<p>You can&#8217;t expect from Tinderbox: online collaboration, custom import of any data, direct export to MS Office documents and the like, table editing within notes, a programmable enviroment (alhtough actions and agents can do a lot already), a Windows version (supposed to be in the making).</p>
<p>Here is a <a href="http://www.sitepoint.com/article/review-tinderbox/">software review by Natan Matias</a> from Sitepoint.</p>


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://wrede.interfacedesign.org/archives/1286.html' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Tinderbox 3.6.3'>Tinderbox 3.6.3</a> <small>One of the tools I love to use is Tinderbox....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://wrede.interfacedesign.org/archives/702.html' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Experimenting with Tinderbox XML'>Experimenting with Tinderbox XML</a> <small>After I sucessfully imported some parts of my old weblog...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://wrede.interfacedesign.org/archives/56.html' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: And the winner is &#8230; Tinderbox!'>And the winner is &#8230; Tinderbox!</a> <small>I decided to do my new weblog with Tinderbox. But...</small></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wrede.interfacedesign.org/archives/1724.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The unawareness of lack of skill</title>
		<link>http://wrede.interfacedesign.org/archives/1129.html</link>
		<comments>http://wrede.interfacedesign.org/archives/1129.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Mar 2006 04:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Wrede</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cognition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.interfacedesign.org/?p=1129</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This appears to be a funny note, but actually it is really something ultimately true: Unskilled and Unaware of It. Justin Kruger and David Dunning made several studies to support following concepts: 1. Incompetent individuals, compared with their more competent peers, will dramatically overestimate their ability and performance relative to objective criteria.2. Incompetent individuals will [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This appears to be a funny note, but actually it is really something ultimately true: <a href="http://www.damninteresting.com/?p=406"  >Unskilled and Unaware of It</a>.</p>
<p>Justin Kruger and David Dunning made several studies to support following concepts:</p>
<blockquote><p>1. Incompetent individuals, compared with their more competent peers, will dramatically overestimate their ability and performance relative to objective criteria.<br />2. Incompetent individuals will suffer from deficient metacognitive skills, in that they will be less able than their more competent peers to recognize competence when they see it&mdash;be it their own or anyone else&#8217;s.<br />3. Incompetent individuals will be less able than their more competent peers to gain insight into their true level of performance by means of social comparison information. In particular, because of their difficulty recognizing competence in others, incompetent individuals will be unable to use information about the choices and performances of others to form more accurate impressions of their own ability.<br />4. The incompetent can gain insight about their shortcomings, but this comes (paradoxically) by making them more competent, thus providing them the metacognitive skills necessary to be able to realize that they have performed poorly.</p></blockquote>
<p>If self-assessment is a crucial part of learning, then gaining insight about own shortcomings (and a good judgment about if and what to do about it) seems to be key.</p>
<p><em>The longer more detailed article from several years ago is <a href="http://www.phule.net/mirrors/unskilled-and-unaware.html"  >here</a>.</em></p>


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://wrede.interfacedesign.org/archives/1001.html' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Gizmo here &#8211; Skype gone'>Gizmo here &#8211; Skype gone</a> <small>On Sunday I decided to switch my DSL provider. After...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://wrede.interfacedesign.org/archives/1005.html' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: How to hire a product manager'>How to hire a product manager</a> <small>Here is someone with a lot of experience in hiring...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://wrede.interfacedesign.org/archives/816.html' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Computer boosts cognitive agility of pre-school children?'>Computer boosts cognitive agility of pre-school children?</a> <small>CNN reports that computer use of children aged 3 to...</small></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wrede.interfacedesign.org/archives/1129.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Continuity</title>
		<link>http://wrede.interfacedesign.org/archives/1085.html</link>
		<comments>http://wrede.interfacedesign.org/archives/1085.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2005 08:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Wrede</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cognition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.interfacedesign.org/?p=1085</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today I started the Continuity seminar weblog (RSS). There is also a special tag-pair on del.icio.us (RSS) for that seminar as well (unfortunatly the URLs will change soon). The topic of that seminar is still evolving, but the task is to understand the psychological and cognitive aspects of flow and its relation to design (mainly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today I started the <a href="http://nexus.design2.fh-aachen.de/seminare/wrede/continuity/"  >Continuity seminar weblog</a> (<a href="http://nexus.design2.fh-aachen.de/seminare/wrede/continuity/?feed=rss2"  >RSS</a>). There is also a <a href="http://del.icio.us/tag/continuity+fb4"  >special tag-pair on del.icio.us</a> (<a href="http://del.icio.us/rss/tag/continuity+fb4"  >RSS</a>) for that seminar as well (unfortunatly the URLs will change soon).</p>
<p>The topic of that seminar is still evolving, but the task is to understand the psychological and cognitive aspects of flow and its relation to design (mainly interaction design).</p>


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://wrede.interfacedesign.org/archives/1072.html' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Density, Simplicity and Continuity'>Density, Simplicity and Continuity</a> <small>I am currently working on defining three seminars that lay...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://wrede.interfacedesign.org/archives/990.html' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Seminars in winter term 2005'>Seminars in winter term 2005</a> <small>This semester I am feeling like thinking about the next...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://wrede.interfacedesign.org/archives/762.html' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Visual Design Elements of Weblogs?'>Visual Design Elements of Weblogs?</a> <small>Lois Ann Scheidt and Elijah Wright:Common Visual Design Elements of...</small></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wrede.interfacedesign.org/archives/1085.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Theory clusters</title>
		<link>http://wrede.interfacedesign.org/archives/982.html</link>
		<comments>http://wrede.interfacedesign.org/archives/982.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Apr 2005 01:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Wrede</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cognition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.interfacedesign.org/?p=982</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At the University Twente there is a overview about communication-related theories. Extremely useful and a must read &#8211; if not must know &#8211; for every designer: The theories presented here are related to communication. Students can use these theories as a rich source for a better understanding of the theoretical fieldwork of communication. Choosing a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the University Twente there is a <a href="http://www.tcw.utwente.nl/theorieenoverzicht/index.html"  >overview about communication-related theories</a>. Extremely useful and a must read &#8211; if not must know &#8211; for every designer:</p>
<blockquote><p>The theories presented here are related to communication. Students can use these theories as a rich source for a better understanding of the theoretical fieldwork of communication. Choosing a theory for an assignment or report is made easier, since you are able to &#8216;browse&#8217; through the different theories. All theories which are selected are used in the courses of Communication Studies. Stay critical when you use a theory, because theories are subjectively measured. A lot of theories are mentioned below, make your own judgment about which theories are most helpful and think why they are helpful.</p></blockquote>


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://wrede.interfacedesign.org/archives/535.html' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Explorations in Learning &amp; Instruction: The Theory Into Practice Database'>Explorations in Learning &amp; Instruction: The Theory Into Practice Database</a> <small>&#187;TIP (theory into practics database) is a tool intended to...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://wrede.interfacedesign.org/archives/807.html' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: BlogWalk 2 &#8211; First impressions'>BlogWalk 2 &#8211; First impressions</a> <small>I am just sitting on the train back from Nuremberg...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://wrede.interfacedesign.org/archives/1129.html' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: The unawareness of lack of skill'>The unawareness of lack of skill</a> <small>This appears to be a funny note, but actually it...</small></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wrede.interfacedesign.org/archives/982.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The cognitive style of parallel writing</title>
		<link>http://wrede.interfacedesign.org/archives/846.html</link>
		<comments>http://wrede.interfacedesign.org/archives/846.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2004 12:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Wrede</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cognition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.interfacedesign.org/?p=846</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephanie Booth is reflecting on the experiment with writing a summary of a conference session as a group in SubEthaEdit (which allows users connected to one host to write together on a single text file; it looks like this -each user has a seperate color- and when finished the result can be published on a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephanie Booth is <a href="http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2004/07/08/taking-collaborative-notes-at-blogtalk/"  >reflecting on the experiment</a> with writing a summary of a conference session as a group in SubEthaEdit (which allows users connected to one host to write together on a single text file; it <a href="http://laurie.informatik.uni-bremen.de/blog/malte/archives/2004_07_06.html#000555"  >looks like this</a> -each user has a seperate color- and when finished the result can be <a href="http://joi.ito.com/joiwiki/BlogTalkNotesPanel4"  >published on a wiki)</a>. She writes:</p>
<blockquote><p>Discipline is needed to separate the actual notes (ie, &#8220;what the conferencer said&#8221;) from the note-taker comments (ie, extra links, commentary, questions, remarks). This isn&#8217;t a big issue when a unique person is taking notes for his or her private use, but it becomes really important when more people are involved. I think that although we did do this to some extent, we were a bit sloppy about it.</p></blockquote>
<p>What instantly popped into my head when reading this was the list of <a href="http://wrede.interfacedesign.org/wiki/StrategiesForKnowledgeTools"  >strategies for knowledge tool users</a> I jotted down one day. SubEthaEdit is a pretty raw editor &#8211; so it may be hard to correlate the intentions. It&#8217;s like a jazz combo, where you need to listen closely and feel the right moment to give signals to your counterparts.</p>
<p>There is no point in trying to summarize the paper or being <i>just</i> adding more links. But is some value in contextualizing and reflecting a presentation. But the most important thing when taking notes is to try to connect it to own thinking.</p>
<p>Now, is a collaborative reflection by writing in a raw editor with rudimentary formatting really clarifying anything for each author? The results appear pretty unorganized and I feel that there is a lot to learn about this practice. And there will probably someone coming up with a tool that is optimized for this &#8220;group thinking by group writing&#8221; task. Without going further into details, some would argue that there is no such thing like &#8220;group thinking&#8221;.</p>


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://wrede.interfacedesign.org/archives/805.html' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Substance of Style'>Substance of Style</a> <small>Virginia Postrel is the author of The Substance of Style...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://wrede.interfacedesign.org/archives/816.html' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Computer boosts cognitive agility of pre-school children?'>Computer boosts cognitive agility of pre-school children?</a> <small>CNN reports that computer use of children aged 3 to...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://wrede.interfacedesign.org/archives/1002.html' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: OPML Editor'>OPML Editor</a> <small>Dave Winer has released his latest project: OPML Editor. I...</small></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wrede.interfacedesign.org/archives/846.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How thinking goes wrong</title>
		<link>http://wrede.interfacedesign.org/archives/827.html</link>
		<comments>http://wrede.interfacedesign.org/archives/827.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2004 02:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Wrede</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cognition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.interfacedesign.org/?p=827</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michael Shermer about twenty-five fallacies that lead us to believe weird things. What a great document about scientific thinking. Related posts:Bailing out in the wrong direction US Government is suggesting a $700 billion financial package to... Deep Thinking about Weblogs Andrew Grumet adds his ideas to the weblog theory: &#187;Weblogs... Luke Wroblewski on Design thinking [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael Shermer about <a href="http://www.positiveatheism.org/writ/sherm3.htm"  >twenty-five fallacies that lead us to believe weird things</a>. What a great document about scientific thinking.</p>


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://wrede.interfacedesign.org/archives/1330.html' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Bailing out in the wrong direction'>Bailing out in the wrong direction</a> <small>US Government is suggesting a $700 billion financial package to...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://wrede.interfacedesign.org/archives/489.html' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Deep Thinking about Weblogs'>Deep Thinking about Weblogs</a> <small>Andrew Grumet adds his ideas to the weblog theory: &#187;Weblogs...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://wrede.interfacedesign.org/archives/1271.html' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Luke Wroblewski on Design thinking'>Luke Wroblewski on Design thinking</a> <small>On the &raquo;SHIFT&laquo; conference Luke Wroblowski presented his ideas about...</small></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wrede.interfacedesign.org/archives/827.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Computer boosts cognitive agility of pre-school children?</title>
		<link>http://wrede.interfacedesign.org/archives/816.html</link>
		<comments>http://wrede.interfacedesign.org/archives/816.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2004 04:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Wrede</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cognition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.interfacedesign.org/?p=816</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CNN reports that computer use of children aged 3 to 5 scored higher on tests that gauge school readiness and cognitive development. Some earlier studies have found computer use improves children&#8217;s fine motor skills and improves recognition of numbers and letters. Is there a study that shows how extensive computer use in early childhood influences [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.cnn.com/2004/TECH/06/07/health.computer.reut/index.html"  >CNN reports</a> that computer use of children aged 3 to 5 scored higher on tests that gauge school readiness and cognitive development.</p>
<blockquote><p>Some earlier studies have found computer use improves children&#8217;s fine motor skills and improves recognition of numbers and letters.</p></blockquote>
<p>Is there a study that shows how extensive computer use in early childhood influences the social skills and empathy?</p>


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://wrede.interfacedesign.org/archives/270.html' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: What they didn&#8217;t teach me in Design &amp; Usability school'>What they didn&#8217;t teach me in Design &amp; Usability school</a> <small>Scott Berkun was program manager at Microsoft for Internet Explorer....</small></li>
<li><a href='http://wrede.interfacedesign.org/archives/817.html' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: How children can learn cognition science'>How children can learn cognition science</a> <small>Through a posting on the simplicity weblog I came across...</small></li>
<li><a href='http://wrede.interfacedesign.org/archives/846.html' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: The cognitive style of parallel writing'>The cognitive style of parallel writing</a> <small>Stephanie Booth is reflecting on the experiment with writing a...</small></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wrede.interfacedesign.org/archives/816.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
