Tomorrow the winter semester 2016/2017 starts. I will be an offering new seminar called »Forecast« that researches design for information systems that can be used to understand developments and future situations.
Two new seminars have been announced for the winter semester (details in German). These seminars are open to all students starting from 3rd semester.
Lecturers: Prof. Dipl.-Des. Oliver Wrede
A seminar for information design interactive media in the context of topics like »Data Journalism«, Generative Gestaltung, »Big Data«, Datenvisualisierung, »Information Mapping«, Informationsgrafik, Data Mining, Open Data, Organic Information Design. Eventually we will use Processing for a lot of the practical aspects.
Seminar blog: campusphere.de/datatransformation
»Multi-Channel-Design – Design of holistic User Experiences«
Lecturers: Dipl.-Des. Wolfgang Gauss und Dipl.-Des. Markus Strick
The title says it all in this one. Students will work on topics like Responsive Design, Liquid Layout, Dynamic Layout, Scaled Content, Flexible Grids and Images, Responsive Imaging, Responsive Adds, Responsive E-Mail, Responsive Video, Cross Channel, Multi Channel, Smartphone, Tablet-PC, Touchpoints & Transmedia Story Telling, Customer Journeys, Use Cases, Device Complexity, User Experience Design, Interaction Design
Seminar blog: campusphere.de/multichanneldesign
The new seminars for summer term 2008 are fixed. It is always a very exciting moment to think about new topics for projects… or rather: to pick the best from the ideas floating around.
And I always love to define topics with a leightweight appearance but at the same time much depth.
Here are the two candidates:
Project seminar: »Habits«
Design research about our habits and how they shape our daily life and how we use things.
Project seminar: »PIM«
Design for Personal Information Management systems.
One of the important things you need to work out as a design educator is what you will give out as first assignment in a seminar or project. It is like a warm-up for a project, something that helps you to move into the problem domain quickly.
Of course there is usually plenty of material to research, collect and talk about almost everytime — but while these things help with orientation in the subject matter, it does have the tendency to cast a damp over experimentation and form-giving.
So in early assigments I seek to propose a task that is technically easy to do on the one hand (in terms of tools you need). I think there are two types of early assignments:
- a practical task that does not require much investigation and yet again is complex in regard to the possible solutions
- a research task that only involves observation and critical thinking
The goal is to help students to make an observation they didn’t expect or did not yet think about and to encourage them to use creative “out-of-bounds” thinking. At the same time it is desired that the extent of the “larger” design problem unfolds as well as all options available to solve it.
If you every have studied design – do you remember any the early assignments you got to get you in that loop?
I was staying away from discussion about weblogs in education for a longer time. Partly because I had other things to do and partly because I wanted to refocus my thoughts (thus getting outside the loop was good).
I found that a some articles have quoted the »Weblogs and discourse« (new URL!) paper. One is »Blogging as pedagogic practice: artefact and ecology.« by Marcus O’Donnell (probably written in May 2005). He referenced an article by Tamsin Haggis called »Constructing Images of Ourselves?« (British Educational Research Journal, Vol. 29, No. 1, 2003).
Just as importantly the ongoing use of blogging as a reflective form of metalearning would also foreground broader issues of academic literacy. As Haggis notes many of the underlying assumptions about the “good student” which underlie current popular theories of education make unrealistic assumptions about their pre-existing skills and general academic literacy.
And continues to quote Haggis:
What often seems to remain unacknowledged is that the attitudes and values which characterise the model’s description of the ideal learner have in fact taken academics themselves many years to learn. It is unlikely that even the most well-educated post-school student arrives in university with the strategies that enable them to learn in [such a developed way]. (2002:98)
Unfortunatly I could not find an online version of Tamsin Haggis’ original document, but I found a disputation of her article by Delia Marshall and Jennifer Case published in the same Journal in April 2005) [PDF here, 100KByte].
In relation to blogging the positions remind me to rethink the difference between “surface learning” and “deep learning” (see here for info). Does the mere activity of blogging ultimately turn into a “deeper” learning process just because of the authorship weblogging usually requires?
I think it is really a question of what kind of “author” a blogger is able to turn into. Many blog posts are by far not “authored” beyond selecting some other blog post and republish that in a new context (e.g. a local learning group or seminar). The blog post as such does not require an intellectual investment (e.g. if you just want to keep some item found online, like this post here). Students blogging like this are more defining their social role within the group as being an active and reliable partner for the research work ahead.
But if you are actually writing a blog entry as a result if a thinking process, with the effort of prioritizing thoughts and communicating ideas, then this this is “intellectual work out”, that will help to get into a “deep learning” mode. The role of the educator is to highlight the benefits of thoughtfully crafted blog posts and to foster interaction and discourse among learners. Thus, his task is to shape a motivating context and to help with “detecting nonsense” so to say.
Students will have a beginner’s phase where they feel the quality their writing falls blow the quality of their thinking. No one learned to swim without getting wet.
Nuvvo is a platform where teachers can add an online course and optionally sell enrollments. Nuvvo is free – but once the instructor charges money Nuvvo will keep an 8% commission of all enrollments sold.
Besides of the fact that this is a really interesting business model, the Nuvvo web application is designed to be as simple and easy to use as possible.
I have written about this before. Now Apple translates the iTunes Music Store model to educational content. Students listen to lectures, download subscribed video feeds or podcasts. Apple acts as a service provider hoping it would broaden the footprint of educational technology.
This semester I am feeling like thinking about the next seminars quite early. If plans do not change one of the next seminars will be called »Continuity«. The seminar will research flow theories, the nature of immersion and pre-concious decision making. Sounds strange though, but it’s going to be fun.
I am still keeping the idea of setting up a »Personal Information Management« introductory course. But right now I don’t really know how this could fit into the curricular structure.
Inspired by the discoveries and upcoming developments in location based services I also think of defining a seminar project that will work on service models and interfaces for that.
I am keeping a growing list of things that could be an interesting seminar topics. It is an expected result of supplementing the former seminars with weblogs: there is always something sparking off there.
I recently had to think about design education again. I sense some divide between approaches of design education. The devide is to some degree a difference between classical and novel ways. I try to identify the differences in these two conceptions:
The classical way
- all theoretical implications are researched in the moment they are required through the practice of work
- designs situations that are supposed to be simulations of working life: assignments are seemingly similar to the kind of jobs you are supposed to do as job starter
- suggests that design methodology and practice basically is fully understood and only tools changes from time to time
- sees success as question of structuring the curriculum into staged levels of increased difficulty
- argues that students start from a very limited base of competences and usually would need to acquire a defined set of competences in a consecutive way
- claims that experiences have shown that students will not be able to identify their lack of knowledge and therefore would not be able to select wise learning goals
- defines professionalism as something that can be reached by affirmation and “learning through observation”
- educational topics are often recruited from mainstream media
- counts high quality results more than the quality of processes
The novel way
- does not necessarily disqualify the classical approach but it strongly questions that this alone will not lead to good design or skillful designers
- regards theoretical implications and practical implications as equally important areas of research
- locates design competence not primarily in the domain of talent, creativity and skills but rather in the cognitive domain
- argues that design and methodology itself is changing (not only the tools) or has yet to be discovered
- says it would be practically impossible or useless to “just” simulate the working life because it would not create the intellect and personality required
- claims that students would not learn to deconstruct, recontextualize, rethink or transfer if only challenged the classical way
- argues that learning strategies that assimilate research strategies play a crucial role (experiment, critical thinking)
- suggests that there needs to be a quest for new questions and not only new answers to known questions
- says that students start with a broad set of competences and experiences and first and foremost need help to be able to reframe their knowledge to foster design processes and attach any useful new experiences
- argues that professionalism can only be reached by a combination of affirmation and inventive thinking
- encourages students to autonomously define their own learning agenda if possible
- suggests that educational topics should not only be recruited from mainstream media but also to great extend from science topics
- counts the quality of the process and the quality of the results as equally important
The problem is that proponents of the “classical way” disqualify the “novel way” as a waste of time, not very effective, anti-disciplinary and over-demanding for students. Usually neither party has to offer empirical data beyond personal experience to support the claims. The same few statistical data about employment rates are often used to support contradicting arguments. There does not seem to be a consensus.